September 17, 2007

CONGRESS RETURNS FROM ITS AUGUST RECESS

 

Outlook for Remainder of 2007

 

Congress returned from its month-long August recess on September 4, 2007, to begin the process of moving an ambitious and jam packed legislative agenda forward while knowing that it will have to confront a President who has promised to veto many of the proposals that Democrats support. In addition to the twelve must pass FY2008 appropriations bills, Democrats have also promised to renew numerous pieces of legislation expiring in 2007, including the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, the Farm Bill and the No Child Left Behind legislation. It’s a lot to do in the context of a legislative calendar that is dwindling. In fact, Democratic leaders have already acknowledged that they will have to remain in town until at least Thanksgiving and most likely into December.

During the past two weeks, the Senate passed three FY2008 appropriations bills, including the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Bill, the State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Bill and the Transportation and Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Bill. You may remember that prior to the August recess the Senate had passed the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill. Therefore, while the House succeeded in passing all twelve of its FY2008 appropriations bills, the Senate still must pass eight more before House – Senate conference negotiations can even begin on two-thirds of the FY2008 appropriations bills. And with the beginning of fiscal year 2008 right around the corner (October 1, 2007), it’s clear that several stopgap spending bills (continuing resolutions) will be required.

Therefore, with just three short weeks until the beginning of FY2008, Democratic leaders are spending a good chunk of their time trying to determine a strategy for confronting a President intent on vetoing many of their appropriations bills. One Democratic strategy that is being discussed involves prohibiting House and Senate negotiators from conferencing any of the bills that have passed each chamber until they have a better sense of the appropriations end game. Democrats are wary of sending bills to President Bush that include additional spending (such as the Veterans Affairs Appropriations Bill) if it means that they will be forced to reduce other programs to pay for the increased funding for veterans. Specifically, the President has said that he will sign the Veterans Affairs Appropriations Bill even though it includes $4 billion more than he requested. The concern is that the President will try to force Democrats to reduce the other appropriations bills by the equivalent amount to offset the additional spending for veterans.

Democratic leaders are also trying to determine which strategy maximizes their leverage against the President, specifically weighing whether it’s better to send individual spending bills to the President or combining appropriations bills into an omnibus or various ‘minibuses.” Some believe that having a vote on an individual bill packed with popular programs, such as those included in the Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations Bill, will allow Democrats to better make their case as opposed to a giant omnibus where the spending priorities can be harder to define.

Regardless of what strategy the Democrats use to negotiate with the President, it appears that they aren’t interested in a government shutdown. Therefore, Democrats plan to send the President a continuing budget resolution that would keep the government open at a spending level negotiated with the White House.

 

TOP OF PAGE

 


 

STATUS OF FY2008 APPROPRIATIONS BILLS:

 

The Key Players and Their Positions

 

President Bush and Jim Nussle, Director of OMB:
The twelve appropriations bills that have moved through the House and now await Senate action (actually eight still await Senate action) include $22 billion more for non-defense domestic discretionary programs than the President requested in his own budget. As a result, the President has issued veto threats on eight of the dozen appropriations bills passed by the House. The four spending bills that have escaped White House veto threats include those that fund the Defense and Treasury departments, the Veteran’s Administration and the legislative branch.

The President appears to be gunning for a showdown fight to refurbish the Republican Party’s fiscal credentials. By drawing a line in the sand and warning Congress not to send him bills that exceed his overall budget request for non-defense domestic discretionary programs, the President believes that his confrontational stance on spending may excite and motive the Republican conservative base, which up until now has been mainly frustrated with the President’s support for an expensive education reform measure, a government-covered prescription drug coverage bill, and six years worth of signed appropriations bills. Many believe that with his poll numbers so low, the President has nothing to lose by challenging the Democratic Congress on spending issues, plus it actually might change the subject from Iraq. In addition, it might give the President some bragging rights that he’d used his veto threats to tamp down runaway government spending.

On Tuesday, September 5, 2007, the Senate confirmed former House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle (R-IA), by a vote of 69-24, to be the next Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the executive agency that negotiates the appropriations bills on behalf of the President. Representative Nussle, known as a hard nosed partisan and fiscal conservative who earned the nickname “knuckles” for his confrontational style in the House, will lead the charge in the budget showdown with Congress.

Democratic Majority:
Democrats have been frustrated that many of their priorities were neglected throughout the past twelve years of Republican rule in Congress. Therefore, when taking over the majority, Democrats planned to provide spending hikes for their priority programs in time for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2008. In fact, Democrats spent much of the past spring and summer strategizing and laying the groundwork to ensure support for their key programs. Democrats succeeded by providing a united front on the FY2008 Budget Resolution, as well as the ensuing decisions to allocate sufficient resources to the appropriations committees that fund many of the priority programs. Certainly, it would be a setback for Democrats if they are unable to boost spending in areas their constituents believe have been long neglected by President Bush.

Republican Minority:
Republicans in Congress increasingly believe that Democrats have thwarted their attempts to influence the appropriations process, and as a result, appear united in supporting the President’s plans to veto the appropriations bills that provide for more spending than Mr. Bush asked for in his budget. During his first press conference upon his return from the August recess, Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell (R-KY), said that Democrats have complete control to appropriate to the programs it deems most worthy, provided that they don’t exceed the President’s top-line figure for non-defense, domestic discretionary programs. Senator McConnell also mentioned that Democrats possess the flexibility to fund its priority programs by reducing programs it believes are less important. Therefore, it sure appears that Republicans are spoiling for a fight with Democrats this fall on spending as a way to regain their reputation for fiscal conservatism.
 

 

TOP OF PAGE

 


 

FLOOR ACTION

 

VA: Senate Passes Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill

 

On September 6, 2007, the Senate passed the FY2008 Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill (S. 1645) by a vote of 92-1. The bill would provide the VA Medical and Prosthetics Research Program with an appropriation of $500 million for FY2008. This is $86 million more than its FY2007 funding level ($414 million) and $89 million more than the President proposed ($411 million).

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

PAGE 1 PAGE 2

 

GO BACK TO SEPTEMBER 17, WASHINGTON UPDATE

 

FASEB’s Washington Update is brought to you bi-monthly by the FASEB Office of Public Affairs. We welcome your questions and comments – please contact Carrie Wolinetz at cwolinetz@faseb.org or 301-634-7650. For more information about how to get involved in research advocacy, visit: http://capwiz.com/faseb/home/

 

   
   
 

Click Here to
Subscribe/Unsubscribe to FASEB Washington Update