January 12, 2007

INSIDE (The Beltway) SCOOP - Jon Retzlaff, Legislative Director

 

With majority control of Congress for the first time in a decade, Democrats are
advocating for fiscal responsibility in order to avoid the dreaded “tax and spend” label.
To this end, Democrats have stated that they intend to propose a long-term plan to
balance the budget by 2012. In addition, one of the main pieces of legislation that House
Democrats passed in its first 100 hours was the “pay-as-you-go” (PAYGO) budget rules.
Under this provision the House, for the first time in years, will be required to pay for any
proposal to cut taxes or increase spending on federal programs by raising taxes or cutting spending elsewhere. The vote to pass PAYGO was hailed as a sign of Democrats’
commitment to restore accountability to federal spending and reduce a budget deficit and national debt that they say have been swollen by Republican tax cuts and military
spending. Incidentally, the President agrees with the Democrats’ goal to balance the
budget by 2012, and Mr. Bush will have the first opportunity to demonstrate how he
plans to do it when he submits his FY2008 budget to Congress in early February.


This action by Congress to implement PAYGO, along with the planned proposals to
balance the country’s budget by 2012, does not bode well for non-defense discretionary
programs, such as spending on scientific research, education, transportation, and
agriculture. If President Bush insists that his tax cuts be maintained, while continuing to
propose increases for defense and homeland security, it will leave only two routes to
balancing the budget: spend less on entitlements, such as Social Security and Medicare,
or squeeze non-defense discretionary spending. If the President and Congress hesitate to confront entitlements as it is politically risky to do so, the cutbacks to non-defense
discretionary programs would have to be vicious to make a difference. This is because
non-defense discretionary spending is less than twenty percent of the budget.

 

BILLS, BILLS, BILLS

 

House and Senate Pass H.R. 3, the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act
On January 11, 2007, the House passed H.R. 3, the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007. The bill would expand the number of embryonic stem cell lines available for federal funding by requiring the Secretary of HHS to conduct and support research using human embryonic stem cells regardless of the date on which such cells were derived. H.R. 3 had 211 cosponsors upon introduction. FASEB’s Office of Public Affairs sent a letter to every member of Congress urging them to support the bill, and issued a press release once the bill passed the House.


The Senate companion, S. 5, was introduced on January 4 by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV). S. 5 had 31 cosponsors upon introduction and is expected to be considered by the Senate in February.

TOP OF PAGE

 


CONGRESSIONAL SCHEDULE

 

The House and Senate returned on January 4, 2007, for the start of the 110th Congress. The next scheduled recess is the week of February 19.

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

PAGE 1PAGE 2

 

GO BACK TO JAN 12, WASHINGTON UPDATE

 

FASEB’s Washington Update is brought to you bi-monthly by the FASEB Office of Public Affairs. We welcome your questions and comments – please contact Carrie Wolinetz at cwolinetz@faseb.org or 301-634-7650. For more information about how to get involved in research advocacy, visit: http://capwiz.com/faseb/home/

 

   
   
 

Click Here to
Subscribe/Unsubscribe to FASEB Washington Update