Peer Review and Priority Setting

FASEB : OPA : Policy Issues

FASEB Policy Statements

Go Back

	FASEB comments on NIH peer review self-study April 7, 2008

>	FASEB President Leo Furcht's Testimony on NIH Reauthorization Before the House Energy & Commerce Committee September 19, 2006

>	FASEB Endorses Congressman Barton's NIH Reauthorization Bill, Applauds Leadership and Commitment September 15, 2006

>	FASEB's General Principles for NIH

>	FASEB Supports SEAB Task Force Recommendations on the Future of Science Programs at DOE January 12, 2004

>	FASEB comments on the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine's Strategic Plan June 21, 2000

>	Should Disease Prevalence Determine NIH Fund Allocations? October, 1998

>	Institute of Medicine/National Research Council Report on Priority-Setting at the NIH July, 1998

>	Senator Bill Frist on Setting Research Priorities December, 1997

>	Testimony of John W. Suttie, PhD, then President of FASEB, before the Senate Labor and Human Resources Subcommittee on Public Health and Safety May 1, 1997

The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) advances biological science through collaborative advocacy for research policies that promote scientific progress and education and lead to improvements in human health.